James 3:10-12
Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be. Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter? Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.
Read all of James Chapter 3 here
Warren Wiersbe, in his commentary series, used the following illustration:
A man at work one day, a professing Christian, got angry and turned loose with a series of oaths and profanities. Embarrassed, he turned to his coworker and said, “I don’t know why I said that. It really isn’t in me.” His partner wisely replied, “It had to be in you, or it wouldn’t have come out of you.”
In real life, I had a friend who faced a similar situation. He, in his younger days(while a believer), had been noted for letting loose with an oath or two when angry or upset. One day, he decided he should clean up his act and quit all of that. His solution was to pick some simple nonsensical word to use in situations where before he would have cursed. I don’t recall what he said the word was, but I do recall that he said he would use that word in place of a curse word. Let’s say the word was “bullfrog.” Every time he would get angry, instead of cursing, he would say, “bullfrog.” That went along fine until one day a coworker, who happened to be a non believer, said the following: “You realize, of course, that using that stupid word doesn’t really change what you mean, right?” Ouch.
Discerning what James is teaching us here is not particularly difficult; in fact, it is very easy. We have already studied the tongue quite a bit, and this passage just continues this analysis.
Note some of his comparisons here: blessing and cursing, sweet and bitter, salt water and fresh. The common vein among these is simple; one of each pair is good and one is not good.
If we show through our words both good and bad consistently, which would see say is the real reflection of what is really inside?
December 5, 2016 at 07:40
The bottom line, is…are we Spirit filled, with our hearts filled with the love of Christ ?? Or is the Lord not first in our lives… It is the power of the Holy Spirit that will tame our otherwise unruly tongue…
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 5, 2016 at 08:13
Amen Bruce
LikeLike
December 5, 2016 at 08:41
One of my friends says. “gosh darn fiddle sticks” instead of a cuss phrase beginning with the first letter of the first two words. It sounds nicer, but it’s still a curse and an affront to Him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 5, 2016 at 08:44
Yup
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 5, 2016 at 10:01
But what would the ‘curse ‘ be don, if someone never intended it as such. It would be difficult to attach motive when there may be none. Just sayin.
God’s leash of grace toward our weaknesses is very long.
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 5, 2016 at 10:14
In this case, I do know the heart of this person and it is just her way of vailing a curse with “polite” words. I confess that I, too, may use the expression. It allows me to blow off steam without requesting Father to condemn the object of my scorn. But it’s still a curse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 5, 2016 at 10:23
I am aware of the text that reads: ‘do they not blaspheme that worthy name whereby ye are called?’
And the answer is yes, some do. It is intentional. I’m just looking at the practical application, you know, if you were to hit your thumb w-a hammer, and lash out:
O gosh darn, or, #h&2_=>?! you get it. It’s hard to attach a ‘curse’ when there is none intended, that’s all.
As to the person you know who cloaks their verbage in polite words, at least they are aware of a wrongdoing, so it just seems hard to imagine they are ‘cursing.’
Perhaps a description of ‘curse’ may be in order. 😉
LikeLiked by 3 people
December 5, 2016 at 11:13
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 5, 2016 at 12:12
Thanks brother Vincent
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 5, 2016 at 17:21
You’re very welcome Brother Wally 💪🤓
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 6, 2016 at 17:16
Good post Wally. The one about the bullfrog is good as I never was comfortable when people substitute words in the place of what is swearing and curses…again good post.
LikeLike
December 6, 2016 at 18:44
Thanks brother Jim. I get your point, and tend to sort of feel the same way. In this fellow’s case his word was just as bad as the real thing because of his heart and mind.
It was pointed out on here, though, by ColorStorm….maybe not always.
Food for thought. I suppose it comes down to each of us and what’s in us. God didn’t use a cookie cutter when He made us eh?
LikeLiked by 1 person